Articles Posted in Multidistrict Litigation (MDL)

Posted

by , , , and

Maryland has filed suit against W.L. Gore & Associates (Gore), a downstream user of PFAS-containing materials, alleging that its manufacturing processes contributed to PFAS contamination through its use of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), including Teflon®-branded PTFE. The complaint asserts that Gore sourced PTFE from E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company (DuPont) and Chemours Company—two PFAS manufacturers already facing lawsuits from Maryland—and used it to manufacture expanded PTFE (ePTFE), a microporous material incorporated into various products, including GORE-TEX® breathable, water-resistant fabrics used in outdoor and athletic apparel.

Continue Reading ›

Posted

by , and

Litigation risks associated with per and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) continue to grow, as demonstrated by settlements over the last year in the set of claims being adjudicated in a multidistrict litigation (MDL-2873) in the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina (“MDL”) and other recent lawsuits.

Continue Reading ›

Posted

by , and

The ongoing multidistrict litigation (MDL) concerning PFAS-containing firefighter foams continues to be an actively litigated matter as well as an area of public concern. PFAS, or per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, have garnered significant attention due to their ubiquitous nature and potential health risks. Firefighter foams have been alleged to contaminate water sources with these harmful chemicals that have raised complex issues of liability, regulation and scientific evidence in response to a rise in litigation for damages.

Continue Reading ›